An independent residents’ campaign in Toronto. Not affiliated with the City of Toronto or any candidate.

Three years as mayor • Municipal election • October 26, 2026

Olivia Chow

Toronto isfallingapart.

Three budgets. A 19% property-tax increase. Here is what she promised, and what Toronto got.

Olivia Chow on a rainy Toronto street at dusk

The case

The mayor is the CEO of the city. The job is simple: keep taxes fair, keep people moving around the city, and keep people safe.

Mayor Olivia Chow has had three years on the job. And the list of what doesn’t work in Toronto is longer than ever.

Under Chow, the city is less affordable and more congested than it has ever been. Under her leadership, crime remains high and we have normalized open-air drug use in parks, on subways, streetcars and buses. The city looks and feels dirty and neglected.

Olivia Chow in a purple-feathered carnival costume giving a thumbs-up on a Toronto street
Mayor Olivia Chow at Toronto’s Caribbean Carnival.
Toronto needs a mayor who focuses on running the cityinstead of promoting dangerous social and economic ideas.

Three years in City Hall

The record

Here are ten issues facing Toronto as a result of Chow’s leadership. Sources are linked in each section and listed in full at the bottom of the page.

Olivia Chow in a hard hat and safety vest speaking at a “Making homes more affordable” podium
01 / 10Affordability

Higher taxes. Bigger spending. Less value for your money.

Toronto residents are struggling with the cost of living. While City Hall doesn’t control every factor driving affordability, Chow’s policies directly increase the cost of owning or renting a home, commuting and running a business.

Taxing Toronto to death

A whopping 19.6% cumulative property tax increase in just three years: the largest since amalgamation. Plus, a tripled Vacant Home Tax, a new luxury home tax, and rising water, garbage and commercial property taxes.

Chow promised “modest” tax increases in her 2023 campaign. Toronto homeowners got some of the largest increases in decades, including a 9.5% increase in 2024 alone (the largest tax increase in 25 years). On September 4, 2026, she pledged to keep future increases “at or around” inflation. Is she to be trusted?

Spending more, delivering less

Toronto’s operating budget has ballooned to $18.9 billion while taxpayers face:

  • 800 additional municipal hires and a growing permanent payroll, largely staffed with bureaucrats sympathetic to far-left causes and radical political organizations, such as Progress Toronto.
  • Overtime costs have soared to $134.2 million.
  • Sick-leave costs have reached $131.9 million.
  • Millions drained from reserves to fund ongoing programs.

Housing: less supply, more pressure

Toronto housing starts plunged 31% in 2025 compared with 2024. By mid-2026, population-adjusted starts had fallen to among their lowest levels since 1996.

At a time when Toronto desperately needs more homes, construction is moving in the wrong direction.

Wasteful spending, everywhere

While residents are squeezed, City Hall has spent millions on questionable priorities:

  • Sankofa Square rebranding: Costs projected to reach $860,000.
  • Dundas renaming: Millions spent on rebranding city assets.
  • Unused software: $11 million wasted on licenses for employees who no longer needed them.
  • Traffic wardens and cosmetic fixes: Millions spent on visible stopgaps while congestion, infrastructure delays and maintenance backlogs persist.
  • Homelessness and shelters: nearly $1 billion spent annually, mostly going to unaccountable non-profits and with over $150 million to bureaucratic salaries and benefits.

The bottom line

Chow keeps asking Toronto residents to pay more—while City Hall spends more, drains reserves and struggles to deliver the basics.

Affordability isn’t just about what things cost. It’s about how much City Hall takes from your household—and what you get in return.

The claim

Chow bases affordability on freezing/capping transit fares, extending library hours and offering certain builders’ incentives and faster approvals.

The record

Taxes and city spending are at record highs, but there is no improvement in maintenance of roads, garbage and other city services. In fact, they’ve become worse.

Why it matters

Chow touts free school meals, frozen TTC fares and extended library hours as proof she’s making Toronto more affordable. These programs may help some households (and only the poorest who pay little to no tax)—but for many residents, the savings are marginal compared with the mounting cost of living.

A few targeted benefits cannot offset years of steep property tax hikes, rising utility bills and growing municipal spending.

Sources:BNN Bloomberg (The Canadian Press), Sep 4, 2026Global News, Jan 8, 2026Toronto Auditor General, Jun 30, 2026CMHC, Jan 16, 2026+6 more

A pile of garbage bags burning on a downtown sidewalk at night, beside the headline “LILLEY: Toronto stalls as taxes soar under Olivia Chow’s mayoralty”
02 / 10The basics

Basic services have deteriorated: under Chow’s leadership, the city is falling apart.

Broken, dirty, overflowing garbage bins are pervasive across the city. Only in 2026, an election year, did Chow finally ask Council to “end the persistent problem of broken and overflowing litter bins.”

Slow snow clearing in the winter of 2025 was a documented citywide complaint, only slightly improved in 2026.

In June 2025, Chow was forced to apologize for closing pools during a heat wave.

The Auditor General found that 17 of 18 Toronto Water state-of-good-repair projects between 2020 and 2025 missed their completion dates. Dangerous gigantic potholes often take weeks for the city to repair; internal staff audits reveal that the city misses its own repair deadlines more than half the time.

The claim

The Chow administration points to improvements in certain basic services like cleanliness, emergency wait times and affordable TTC.

The record

You pay 19% more in property tax. The bins are still full, the buses still bunch, and the mayor’s own description of the city was that it’s “falling apart.”

Why it matters

A tax increase is a social contract. Pay more, get a city that works.

Sources:CBC News, Mar 4, 2026CityNews, Jul 12, 2024CBC News, Nov 5, 2025CP24, Jun 23, 2025+7 more

03 / 10Homelessness

$3.2 billion to fight homelessness — where are the results?

Toronto has poured billions into homelessness, yet the crisis has continued to grow.

The numbers tell the story:

  • $3.2 billion spent on the shelter system over four years.
  • $674.5 million planned for up to 20 new shelters and 1,600 spaces by 2033 - over 70% of this amount is financed by debt. That works out to roughly $422,000 per bed, far more expensive than market housing.
  • $507.5 million has now been approved to acquire, design and build 13 shelters.
  • Number of builds: 0

For all this additional money, homelessness increased from about 7,300 people in April 2021 to 15,418 in October 2024.

Audits by Toronto’s Auditor General have caught millions in third-party operator surpluses and unrecovered funds sitting idle instead of being put back into beds.

Billions spent. Demand keeps rising.

The City has also faced criticism over the use of sole-source contracts, worth over $300 million. No competition, no accountability.

Shelter locations — residents have no say

City picks the site. Residents are told afterward. Several proposed shelter locations are near schools, daycares and seniors’ residences, yet residents have no say into where these facilities are placed.

The claim

Mayor Chow has highlighted reductions in encampments as evidence of progress. But moving people out of encampments does not mean they have moved into permanent housing. It does nothing to solve the underlying hard drug and mental health issues this population experiences.

Moving people is not the same as solving homelessness.

The record

Twice as many people on the street. Billions allocated for homelessness. No new shelters built. Tents beside playgrounds. And neighborhoods told where the shelter goes after it has been decided.

Why it matters

Toronto needs measurable results in exchange for billions spent on homelessness in only a few years: fewer people entering homelessness and disrupting the public realm, and far greater accountability for every tax dollar spent.

Sources:City of Toronto, Jul 7, 2025City of Toronto (BudgetTO), Jan 2026City of Toronto (Executive Committee report), Jun 4, 2024Toronto Sun (via Yahoo News Canada), May 2, 2026+7 more

Olivia Chow riding a bicycle with a basket of flowers across Nathan Phillips Square
04 / 10Congestion

88% say gridlock is serious. 72% say the City runs road work badly.

In May 2026, Liaison Strategies asked Torontonians about traffic. 88% said congestion is a serious problem where they live. 71% said it got worse in the past year. 72% said the City does a poor job coordinating road work. The pollster’s read:

“People are not just saying there are too many cars. They are saying the system is badly managed.”

The mayor’s response, three years in: quadruple traffic agents to 100, budget about $299 million for a congestion plan, and in January 2026 hire the city’s first chief congestion officer. A University of Toronto transportation professor noted that creating the job “places the blame for congestion squarely on mismanagement.”

Through the same period, she spent political capital fighting the province to keep bike lanes on Bloor, Yonge and University while construction lane closures multiplied.

The claim

100 traffic agents, a $299 million plan, and a chief congestion officer.

The record

71% say traffic got worse in the last year. 72% say the City manages road work poorly.

Why it matters

Time stuck in traffic is a tax nobody voted on. Contractors closing lanes for months with no coordination is a City Hall problem, not a weather problem. Hiring someone to be in charge of it in year three is an admission.

Sources:Liaison Strategies, May 14, 2026CP24, Mar 27, 2026CBC News, Jan 9, 2026CBC News, Nov 14, 2024+5 more

Olivia Chow smiling and giving a thumbs-up with a microphone in hand, beside the CBC headline “Public safety top of mind for Torontonians as mayoral race tightens, poll suggests”
05 / 10Public safety

Crime remains a major concern.

Crime remains one of Toronto residents’ top concerns according to the City’s 2025 public-opinion survey. A recent poll has nearly 7 in 10 residents concerned about crime and safety. 6 in 10 believe crime has increased.

Auto theft is rising again. Toronto Police report that auto thefts are up 8.8% so far in 2026, even as auto theft has declined across Ontario. Experts describe Toronto as a major hub for organized auto theft.

Residents in communities across the city have also raised concerns about break-and-enters, retail theft, never ending hateful protests, harassment and hate crimes. Add this to an exponential rise in illegal drug use and the pattern is clear.

Chow and the Toronto Police, a relationship marked with conflict

In February 2024, Toronto Police requested an additional $20 million on a nearly $1.2-billion budget. Chow offered just $7.4 million—$12.6 million short. Chief Myron Demkiw warned the shortfall posed an “unacceptable risk,” as priority calls averaged 22-minute waits against a 6-minute standard.

Chow insisted there were “no cuts” before reversing course on February 13 and approving the full request.

In 2026, she approved another $93.8-million police budget increase, defending it amid a corruption probe that saw seven serving officers charged.

First criticized for shortchanging police, then for increasing their funding, Chow found herself under fire from both sides.

The claim

Major crime is down.

The record

While some violent crime statistics are down, other crimes are up. In 2024, priority calls waited 22 minutes. Four in ten still do not feel safe on the TTC.

Why it matters

After substantial increases in policing and safety spending, are residents seeing the level of safety they expect?

Sources:CBC News, Jan 28, 2024CBC News, Feb 13, 2024NOW Toronto, Feb 11, 2026CBC News, Sep 18, 2026+5 more

06 / 10Transit

Billions invested, reliability and safety remain major concerns.

Toronto is pouring billions into its transit system — yet riders continue to experience delays, service disruptions, aging infrastructure and persistent concerns about safety and cleanliness.

Increasingly it’s become a filthy homeless shelter on wheels where drug addicts and homeless urinate, defecate and use hard drugs openly in front of children and seniors.

In July 2026, the TTC reported that total delay minutes were up 12% year over year, driven primarily by passenger-related delays.

At the same time, the TTC is operating under enormous budgets: $16.7 billion in the 2026–2035 capital plan, $3.03 billion in 2026 operating expenditures.

Ridership

Year after year, declining ridership. Long-term trends indicate the system is carrying 21% to 25.8% fewer passengers than it did during its peak in 2019.

Safety

Safety remains a major TTC focus, public perception of safety remains an issue, in part due to the City’s policy shift away from law enforcement to social outreach. 4 in 10 riders do not feel safe.

Cleanliness and disorder

Riders and businesses have raised concerns about disorder, public drug use, public urination and other behavior occurring on or around the transit system. These problems affect the experience of passengers — including children, seniors and families.

The claim

Chow measures improvements on the TTC based on fare freezes and 10 ride weekly caps.

The record

Prioritizing fare freezes over multi-billion-dollar infrastructure upkeep has left the system vulnerable to cascading daily breakdowns.

Why it matters

Delay increases and dropping ridership numbers indicate that the TTC is becoming less reliable and safe under Chow’s watch. Asked what would get people back on transit, riders put reliable service first and lower fares far down the list.

Sources:TTC, Jul 22, 2026City of Toronto, Jan 8, 2026Global News, Dec 23, 2025TTC, Dec 10, 2025+7 more

07 / 10Public health

Pipes, needles and failed policies.

Millions of dollars in drug paraphernalia. Record levels of disorder. Where is the accountability?

Between 2021 and 2025, Toronto distributed 2.34 million meth pipes, 3.45 million crack pipes and 14.92 million syringes—much of it branded with the City’s own logo.

That’s nearly 700,000 crack pipes, almost half a million meth pipes and close to 3 million syringes every year.

Despite years of expanded harm-reduction programs and safe-consumption sites, Toronto continues to face a devastating opioid crisis. Meanwhile, residents have watched public drug use, discarded needles and pipes, and visible street disorder become an increasingly disturbing part of daily life.

Following the Province’s decision to withdraw funding from certain supervised consumption sites and shift its approach toward treatment and recovery, Ontario reported a significant decline in opioid-related deaths. That decline raises serious questions about the direction Toronto’s harm-reduction strategy has taken. This issue is inseparable from the billion-dollar homeless shelter boondoggle.

Mayor Olivia Chow opposed the Province’s changes. She also supported decriminalizing all drugs, asking the federal government to exempt Toronto from Canada’s drug laws.

Our streets are not treatment centers. Our sidewalks are not injection sites.

And residents should not have to navigate a city that increasingly resembles Zombieland.

Compassion must include treatment, recovery and safer public spaces—not an endless supply of drug paraphernalia and a willingness to accept public disorder as the new normal.

The claim

Harm reduction saves lives.

The record

Public drug use has become normalized while residents, businesses and neighborhoods bear the consequences.

Why it matters

The “harm reduction” approach is a failed policy that Mayor Chow and her cronies are doubling down on.

Sources:National Post, Jan 30, 2026SubscriptionCBC News, Aug 20, 2024CBC News, Jul 5, 2026Toronto Sun (via Yahoo News Canada), Aug 19, 2026+6 more

A masked protester holding a green smoke flare among Palestinian flags at a downtown Toronto protest, beside the headline “Michael Higgins: In Olivia Chow’s Toronto, Jew hatred is relentless”
08 / 10Antisemitism

Antisemitism in Toronto: where is the mayor?

Toronto’s Jewish community makes up just 3.6% of the population—yet accounts for 82% of religiously motivated hate crimes. Since 2023, synagogues, Jewish schools and businesses have faced gunfire, threats and intimidation.

Toronto’s Jewish community deserved a mayor who would stand firm, protect its residents and confront antisemitism without hesitation.

Instead, Mayor Olivia Chow’s leadership has repeatedly fallen short.

Hate in the streets. Consequences nowhere.

Toronto has endured years of disruptive protests, blocked roads, intimidating rhetoric and growing fear in Jewish neighborhoods. Pro-Hamas thugs have displayed swastikas and called for the genocide of Jews with impunity.

The right to protest is fundamental. The right to intimidate, obstruct emergency access or disregard public safety is not.

Chow and her far-left cronies have failed to demonstrate meaningful leadership. Jewish families should never have to fear walking through their own neighborhoods.

A mayor cannot control every protest—but can demand consistent enforcement, protect vulnerable institutions and make clear that no group is above the law.

“Don’t bother” laying charges?

In December 2025, Chow claimed a lawyer at Toronto Police headquarters had advised officers not to bother pursuing hate-crime charges because prosecutions might fail.

The lawyer was reportedly identified as Falguni Debnath, General Counsel and Chief’s Counsel for the Toronto Police Service.

Chief Myron Demkiw disputed Chow’s account, denying that police lawyers direct officers not to lay charges.

The contradiction demands answers.

Who said what? What advice was given? And were efforts to hold alleged offenders accountable undermined? Is accommodating the pro-Hamas demographic, apparently based on the advice of Debnath the prime directive of the Toronto police now?

When antisemitism is surging, the message from City Hall cannot be “Don’t bother.”

A mayor absent when Jewish Toronto needed her

  • October 2024: Chow missed the massive October 7 anniversary vigil attended by thousands, including Premier Doug Ford and former mayor John Tory.
  • May 2024: She skipped the Israel Independence Day flag-raising at City Hall, describing it as “a bit divisive.”
  • June 2025: She did not attend Toronto’s Walk with Israel, drawing approximately 56,000 people.
  • June 2026: She again missed the Walk with Israel, which drew more than 60,000 participants.
  • September 2026: She was absent from a mayoral forum at a synagogue focused on antisemitism and community safety.

On the other hand, in November 2025, at a Muslim event closed to media and left off her public itinerary, she referred to “the genocide in Gaza.” At Toronto’s Pride Parade, June 2026, Chow enthusiastically chanted “Free Palestine”—a highly charged slogan amid rising antisemitism and fears within Toronto’s Jewish community. Whose concerns receive her attention?

Missing a single Jewish event is a scheduling issue. Consistently failing to attend is a personal and political choice.

The claim

Chow has issued statements condemning antisemitism. Her administration points to increased police resources and other measures intended to protect Jewish institutions and neighborhoods.

The record

Antisemitism continues to surge with no meaningful results.

Why it matters

Toronto needs leadership that confronts antisemitism—not excuses it, minimizes it or allows enforcement to falter. The mayor must represent all people, not a chosen few.

Sources:The Jerusalem Post, May 17, 2026Toronto Sun (via Yahoo News Canada), Dec 16, 2025CP24, Oct 9, 2024Global News, May 14, 2024+8 more

What the press is asking

Toronto Sun · Brian LilleyProgress Toronto’s radical agenda is no way to run a cityToronto Life · Editor’s LetterWho’s pulling the strings in the upcoming mayoral election?

Progress Toronto’s own words“We elected Olivia Chow.”

ICC → PT leadership → campaign organizing → City Hall

09 / 10Progress Toronto connection

Who is really running Toronto?

The political network behind Chow—and the questions Torontonians deserve answered.

Toronto has no formal municipal political parties. But Progress Toronto (PT) operates like a de facto political party, taking credit for electing Olivia Chow and five progressive councillors.

Through endorsements, campaign organizing and its network of elected officials and political staff, PT has built an ideological pipeline into City Hall. Yet its funding, influence and accountability remain matters deserving public scrutiny.

Chow’s Progress Toronto connection

Chow’s former Chief of Staff, Michal Hay, was PT’s founding Executive Director. Chow herself donated $200 to PT months before her successful 2023 mayoral campaign.

PT advocates higher taxes, a rain tax, ending TTC fare enforcement and expanding shelters across neighborhoods.

Sound familiar? The overlap with Chow’s agenda raises serious questions about how deeply PT’s priorities are embedded in City Hall.

The ICC connection: a network worth scrutinizing

PT Executive Director Saman Tabasinejad and advisor Pouyan Tabasinejad previously held senior roles within the Iranian Canadian Congress (ICC).

The ICC advocated restoring diplomatic relations with Iran, opposed additional sanctions and publicly opposed Canada’s designation of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist entity.

That creates a documented personnel bridge:

ICC → PT leadership and advisors → municipal campaign organizing → political influence at City Hall.

Chow’s absence—and the questions it raises

On February 14, 2026, an estimated 350,000 people gathered in Toronto for the Global Day of Action for Iran, demanding freedom and an end to repression by the Islamic Republic. Premier Doug Ford attended. Chow was notably absent, prompting criticism from members of the Iranian-Canadian community.

Why was Toronto’s mayor absent from such a major demonstration in support of Iranians fighting for freedom? Taken alongside her position towards the Jewish community and the pattern is clear.

That question carries added weight when considered alongside the ICC advocacy history of individuals connected to PT—and PT’s political pipeline into Chow’s administration.

The claim

PT claims to be a not-for-profit organization that advocates and organizes for a more democratic, socially just, and progressive city.

The record

A shadow, far-left cabal funded by dark money, with sinister foreign connections heavily influencing city hall.

Why it matters

When the mayor’s political network includes senior figures with a history of promoting radical policies and supporting the IRGC - a terrorist organization - the public deserves transparency about who really runs Toronto.

Sources:Toronto Life, Sep 21, 2026Progress Toronto, n.d.Progress Toronto, n.d.National Post (via Yahoo News Canada), Jun 13, 2026+11 more

10 / 10Leadership

Toronto needs a serious mayor.

Toronto is not a small town looking for a mascot. It is the third-largest city in North America and the economic engine of Canada. The decisions made at City Hall affect more than three million residents, businesses across the country and a regional economy that generates a huge share of Canada’s economic output.

Yet under Olivia Chow, there has often been a striking emphasis on photo-ops, celebrations, dancing, partying and publicity stunts—from sporting events to dressing up in costumes, festivals and social-media moments. Her public persona has even been described by local media as a “defining feature” of her mayoralty.

There is nothing wrong with a mayor enjoying the city. The problem is when the optics appear to overshadow the job.

Toronto needs a mayor who is relentlessly focused on the fundamentals: public safety, reliable transit, clean streets, housing, infrastructure, traffic, fiscal discipline and competent delivery of basic services.

The mayor’s job is not to be Toronto’s chief cheerleader. It is to manage one of North America’s largest cities. That requires strong managerial discipline, clear priorities, accountability and policies that actually deliver results.

Instead, too often, Chow’s approach can look like politics by applause line and photo opportunity—pandering to the loudest constituencies while the harder, less glamorous work of running the city gets pushed into the background.

Toronto doesn’t need more performance from City Hall.

The question voters should be asking is simple:

Is Olivia Chow running Toronto like the major global city it is—or treating City Hall like a circus stage?

Sources:City of Toronto, Aug 24, 2026Toronto Global, n.d.NOW Toronto, Jun 2, 2026Toronto Sun (via Yahoo News Canada), Aug 5, 2025+3 more

Want a mayor who does the job?

On October 26,vote her out.

I’m in

Join the coalition

Help us finish this.

If you are paying more and getting less, you are not alone. Share the record. Tell your neighbours. Show up in October.